232 Pagosa Street - Mixed-Use Development - Major Design Review

Share 232 Pagosa Street - Mixed-Use Development - Major Design Review on Facebook Share 232 Pagosa Street - Mixed-Use Development - Major Design Review on Twitter Share 232 Pagosa Street - Mixed-Use Development - Major Design Review on Linkedin Email 232 Pagosa Street - Mixed-Use Development - Major Design Review link

The Town of Pagosa Springs has received an application for a revised “Final Major Design Review” application for Eagle Mountain, for the 3 vacant lots located at 232 Pagosa Street. This revised proposal includes 3 stories in a 7,098 square foot footprint. The building includes a 32-stall parking garage, 6,589 SF at ground level in 3 commercial units, and 7 residential units on the 2nd and 3rd stories.

The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, January 23, 2024, at 5:30 pm to consider the Final Major Design Review.

Public Hearings and Meetings will be conducted in person at 551 Hot Springs Blvd and also available for remote attendance via the Zoom meeting platform. Public comment will be taken in person and over Zoom. To access the meeting agendas and staff reports, click the round Minutes and Agendas tab located along the bottom of the photo on the Town’s website home page at pagosasprings.co.gov. You may also view the application at mypagosa.org/proposed-development-projects.

We encourage interested parties to contact the Planning Division prior to the public hearing dates, with any questions via phone at 970-264-4151 x221 or email at cschultz@pagosasprings.co.gov. Written comments received 7 days prior to the meeting or public hearing will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Public comments will be accepted at the public hearings/meetings.

The Town of Pagosa Springs has received an application for a revised “Final Major Design Review” application for Eagle Mountain, for the 3 vacant lots located at 232 Pagosa Street. This revised proposal includes 3 stories in a 7,098 square foot footprint. The building includes a 32-stall parking garage, 6,589 SF at ground level in 3 commercial units, and 7 residential units on the 2nd and 3rd stories.

The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, January 23, 2024, at 5:30 pm to consider the Final Major Design Review.

Public Hearings and Meetings will be conducted in person at 551 Hot Springs Blvd and also available for remote attendance via the Zoom meeting platform. Public comment will be taken in person and over Zoom. To access the meeting agendas and staff reports, click the round Minutes and Agendas tab located along the bottom of the photo on the Town’s website home page at pagosasprings.co.gov. You may also view the application at mypagosa.org/proposed-development-projects.

We encourage interested parties to contact the Planning Division prior to the public hearing dates, with any questions via phone at 970-264-4151 x221 or email at cschultz@pagosasprings.co.gov. Written comments received 7 days prior to the meeting or public hearing will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Public comments will be accepted at the public hearings/meetings.

Questions

Do you have any questions for staff? Ask them here.

Please email at Cindy Schultz at cschultz@pagosasprings.co.gov with any written comments that you would like forwarded to the Design Review Board for their consideration.

loader image
Forgot password?
Didn't receive confirmation?
Register Now
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share Who is the developer for this project? Does the developer plan to sell the project upon completion? I was unable to find that info in the available online documents? What are the proposed per foot rental rates for this project? on Facebook Share Who is the developer for this project? Does the developer plan to sell the project upon completion? I was unable to find that info in the available online documents? What are the proposed per foot rental rates for this project? on Twitter Share Who is the developer for this project? Does the developer plan to sell the project upon completion? I was unable to find that info in the available online documents? What are the proposed per foot rental rates for this project? on Linkedin Email Who is the developer for this project? Does the developer plan to sell the project upon completion? I was unable to find that info in the available online documents? What are the proposed per foot rental rates for this project? link

    Who is the developer for this project? Does the developer plan to sell the project upon completion? I was unable to find that info in the available online documents? What are the proposed per foot rental rates for this project?

    BT asked 10 months ago

    Hi BT, 

    The developers are a partnership and currently own the subject lots who will operate the commercial spaces once developed (Reynolds Ash + Associates and Alley House Restaurant). The residential units will be sold. Whether future buyers will rent them short- or long-term is unknown. Rental rates aren’t typically posted until the development nears construction and are based off construction and operation costs.


    -MyPagosa Team

  • Share The proposed building at 232 Pagosa St is built to the north setback, which is 5’ off of the alley. La Plata Electric Association (LPEA) has high-voltage utility lines that extend approximately 3’ to 4’ into the setback. LPEA requires that any building must be at least 10’ from the high-voltage utility lines. Therefore, if the utility lines are located approximately 3’ to 4’ into the setback, wouldn’t the building need to be 13’ – 14’ from the north property line to provide the required 10’ distance from the utility lines? on Facebook Share The proposed building at 232 Pagosa St is built to the north setback, which is 5’ off of the alley. La Plata Electric Association (LPEA) has high-voltage utility lines that extend approximately 3’ to 4’ into the setback. LPEA requires that any building must be at least 10’ from the high-voltage utility lines. Therefore, if the utility lines are located approximately 3’ to 4’ into the setback, wouldn’t the building need to be 13’ – 14’ from the north property line to provide the required 10’ distance from the utility lines? on Twitter Share The proposed building at 232 Pagosa St is built to the north setback, which is 5’ off of the alley. La Plata Electric Association (LPEA) has high-voltage utility lines that extend approximately 3’ to 4’ into the setback. LPEA requires that any building must be at least 10’ from the high-voltage utility lines. Therefore, if the utility lines are located approximately 3’ to 4’ into the setback, wouldn’t the building need to be 13’ – 14’ from the north property line to provide the required 10’ distance from the utility lines? on Linkedin Email The proposed building at 232 Pagosa St is built to the north setback, which is 5’ off of the alley. La Plata Electric Association (LPEA) has high-voltage utility lines that extend approximately 3’ to 4’ into the setback. LPEA requires that any building must be at least 10’ from the high-voltage utility lines. Therefore, if the utility lines are located approximately 3’ to 4’ into the setback, wouldn’t the building need to be 13’ – 14’ from the north property line to provide the required 10’ distance from the utility lines? link

    The proposed building at 232 Pagosa St is built to the north setback, which is 5’ off of the alley. La Plata Electric Association (LPEA) has high-voltage utility lines that extend approximately 3’ to 4’ into the setback. LPEA requires that any building must be at least 10’ from the high-voltage utility lines. Therefore, if the utility lines are located approximately 3’ to 4’ into the setback, wouldn’t the building need to be 13’ – 14’ from the north property line to provide the required 10’ distance from the utility lines?

    sarahbnemeth asked almost 2 years ago

    Hi Sarah and Robert, 

    The development applicant will need to work with LPEA for setbacks from their electric lines or to reach an agreement to underground the overhead electric and/or communication lines along the development boundary. Any changes would need to be presented in their Final Major Design Review application for consideration. 

  • Share If any of these units become STRs then they must abide by the $150 per bedroom fee per month that the recent resolution mandates, just like the rest of the properties within town limits. Right ? If Yes, is that language written in the business plan so that prospective owners are aware of this requirement since the law went into effect (pending litigation) after the plans were submitted for your review? on Facebook Share If any of these units become STRs then they must abide by the $150 per bedroom fee per month that the recent resolution mandates, just like the rest of the properties within town limits. Right ? If Yes, is that language written in the business plan so that prospective owners are aware of this requirement since the law went into effect (pending litigation) after the plans were submitted for your review? on Twitter Share If any of these units become STRs then they must abide by the $150 per bedroom fee per month that the recent resolution mandates, just like the rest of the properties within town limits. Right ? If Yes, is that language written in the business plan so that prospective owners are aware of this requirement since the law went into effect (pending litigation) after the plans were submitted for your review? on Linkedin Email If any of these units become STRs then they must abide by the $150 per bedroom fee per month that the recent resolution mandates, just like the rest of the properties within town limits. Right ? If Yes, is that language written in the business plan so that prospective owners are aware of this requirement since the law went into effect (pending litigation) after the plans were submitted for your review? link

    If any of these units become STRs then they must abide by the $150 per bedroom fee per month that the recent resolution mandates, just like the rest of the properties within town limits. Right ? If Yes, is that language written in the business plan so that prospective owners are aware of this requirement since the law went into effect (pending litigation) after the plans were submitted for your review?

    reggaedog asked over 2 years ago

    Hello reggaedog, 

    Yes, any STRs within the Town are subject to the $150/bedroom per month fee, pending subsequent court decision.  Owners are solely responsible for conducting thorough due diligence before investing in any property. 

    Sincerely, 

    MyPaogsa.org Team 

  • Share Love the idea of a parking garage under the structure. How many spaces? And will it include electric car chargers? That should be a requirement for any development of this scope. Also, could two of the condo units be dedicated to more affordable housing? Maybe do 6 three-bedroom condos and 3 two-bedroom apartments for long-term lease? on Facebook Share Love the idea of a parking garage under the structure. How many spaces? And will it include electric car chargers? That should be a requirement for any development of this scope. Also, could two of the condo units be dedicated to more affordable housing? Maybe do 6 three-bedroom condos and 3 two-bedroom apartments for long-term lease? on Twitter Share Love the idea of a parking garage under the structure. How many spaces? And will it include electric car chargers? That should be a requirement for any development of this scope. Also, could two of the condo units be dedicated to more affordable housing? Maybe do 6 three-bedroom condos and 3 two-bedroom apartments for long-term lease? on Linkedin Email Love the idea of a parking garage under the structure. How many spaces? And will it include electric car chargers? That should be a requirement for any development of this scope. Also, could two of the condo units be dedicated to more affordable housing? Maybe do 6 three-bedroom condos and 3 two-bedroom apartments for long-term lease? link

    Love the idea of a parking garage under the structure. How many spaces? And will it include electric car chargers? That should be a requirement for any development of this scope. Also, could two of the condo units be dedicated to more affordable housing? Maybe do 6 three-bedroom condos and 3 two-bedroom apartments for long-term lease?

    Holter asked over 2 years ago

    Hello Holter, 

    The parking structure includes 26 spaces on the lower level accessed from San Juan Street and 17 on the main level accessed from the alley. The proposal does not mention vehicle charging stations, but it is possible. The updated LUDC does contemplate including these with new development. The proposal as it stands does not include any workforce housing. The agenda brief does indicate that the zoning district allows 7 units, for which an 8th unit would require a Density Bonus which would require at least one unit of workforce housing.

    -MyPagosa Team