Proposed Development Projects
Share Proposed Development Projects on Facebook
Share Proposed Development Projects on Twitter
Share Proposed Development Projects on Linkedin
Email Proposed Development Projects link
- Below are recently proposed development projects:
Pagosa West - Sketch Subdivision - South Pagosa Blvd
600 W US Hwy 160 - Pagosa Views - Preliminary Major Subdivision
Aspen Village Drive - Multifamily Residential Housing Units - PD Amendment and Major Design ReviewPlease visit the Approved Development Projects page for recently approved Town development projects.
- Below are recently proposed development projects:
Pagosa West - Sketch Subdivision - South Pagosa Blvd600 W US Hwy 160 - Pagosa Views - Preliminary Major Subdivision
Aspen Village Drive - Multifamily Residential Housing Units - PD Amendment and Major Design ReviewPlease visit the Approved Development Projects page for recently approved Town development projects.
Questions
Do you have any questions for staff? Ask them here!
-
Share REF Pagosa Lakes Ranch development and 100 Drago proposal for 100 acres on north side of PLR development. 1. Original development of PLR, circa 1980's has not been removed from records. What action will Planning Board take about the original plat development and this new proposal on the same 100 acres that has yet to be sold to the "alleged developer" 2. Has the FAA, Regional Hospital, et. al. been contacted and has any agency responded to restrictions on building construction impacting the free availability of flight access to the hospital emergency landing pad. 3. There appears to be sufficient reason to question the proposed multi storied "building", e.g., hotels, apartments, etc., that would or could exceed the current 35 foot height restrictions on construction in this area. See land use codes for multiple references to height restrictions. 4. What can be done on any of this proposal from "Dragoo" until he or his company obtains ownership of the land, and when and if that occurs, what can be done to ascertain who or whom any "buyers" would be of the "lots" eventually approved by the board and ultimately the city. How much of this proposal and projects are dependent upon use of tax payer dollars; how much, which agency, and who controls. 5. Last, this "Dragoo" proposal appears to have a significant impact on vehicle traffic, foot traffic, increased use of our already limited water resources, and bigger impact on sewage and drainage. Where and when do PAWS, LPEA get involved, informed and costed. Who pays for all this added infrastructure? "if you would not pay for it from your checkbook (pocket) why should the taxpayer be expected to?" on Facebook Share REF Pagosa Lakes Ranch development and 100 Drago proposal for 100 acres on north side of PLR development. 1. Original development of PLR, circa 1980's has not been removed from records. What action will Planning Board take about the original plat development and this new proposal on the same 100 acres that has yet to be sold to the "alleged developer" 2. Has the FAA, Regional Hospital, et. al. been contacted and has any agency responded to restrictions on building construction impacting the free availability of flight access to the hospital emergency landing pad. 3. There appears to be sufficient reason to question the proposed multi storied "building", e.g., hotels, apartments, etc., that would or could exceed the current 35 foot height restrictions on construction in this area. See land use codes for multiple references to height restrictions. 4. What can be done on any of this proposal from "Dragoo" until he or his company obtains ownership of the land, and when and if that occurs, what can be done to ascertain who or whom any "buyers" would be of the "lots" eventually approved by the board and ultimately the city. How much of this proposal and projects are dependent upon use of tax payer dollars; how much, which agency, and who controls. 5. Last, this "Dragoo" proposal appears to have a significant impact on vehicle traffic, foot traffic, increased use of our already limited water resources, and bigger impact on sewage and drainage. Where and when do PAWS, LPEA get involved, informed and costed. Who pays for all this added infrastructure? "if you would not pay for it from your checkbook (pocket) why should the taxpayer be expected to?" on Twitter Share REF Pagosa Lakes Ranch development and 100 Drago proposal for 100 acres on north side of PLR development. 1. Original development of PLR, circa 1980's has not been removed from records. What action will Planning Board take about the original plat development and this new proposal on the same 100 acres that has yet to be sold to the "alleged developer" 2. Has the FAA, Regional Hospital, et. al. been contacted and has any agency responded to restrictions on building construction impacting the free availability of flight access to the hospital emergency landing pad. 3. There appears to be sufficient reason to question the proposed multi storied "building", e.g., hotels, apartments, etc., that would or could exceed the current 35 foot height restrictions on construction in this area. See land use codes for multiple references to height restrictions. 4. What can be done on any of this proposal from "Dragoo" until he or his company obtains ownership of the land, and when and if that occurs, what can be done to ascertain who or whom any "buyers" would be of the "lots" eventually approved by the board and ultimately the city. How much of this proposal and projects are dependent upon use of tax payer dollars; how much, which agency, and who controls. 5. Last, this "Dragoo" proposal appears to have a significant impact on vehicle traffic, foot traffic, increased use of our already limited water resources, and bigger impact on sewage and drainage. Where and when do PAWS, LPEA get involved, informed and costed. Who pays for all this added infrastructure? "if you would not pay for it from your checkbook (pocket) why should the taxpayer be expected to?" on Linkedin Email REF Pagosa Lakes Ranch development and 100 Drago proposal for 100 acres on north side of PLR development. 1. Original development of PLR, circa 1980's has not been removed from records. What action will Planning Board take about the original plat development and this new proposal on the same 100 acres that has yet to be sold to the "alleged developer" 2. Has the FAA, Regional Hospital, et. al. been contacted and has any agency responded to restrictions on building construction impacting the free availability of flight access to the hospital emergency landing pad. 3. There appears to be sufficient reason to question the proposed multi storied "building", e.g., hotels, apartments, etc., that would or could exceed the current 35 foot height restrictions on construction in this area. See land use codes for multiple references to height restrictions. 4. What can be done on any of this proposal from "Dragoo" until he or his company obtains ownership of the land, and when and if that occurs, what can be done to ascertain who or whom any "buyers" would be of the "lots" eventually approved by the board and ultimately the city. How much of this proposal and projects are dependent upon use of tax payer dollars; how much, which agency, and who controls. 5. Last, this "Dragoo" proposal appears to have a significant impact on vehicle traffic, foot traffic, increased use of our already limited water resources, and bigger impact on sewage and drainage. Where and when do PAWS, LPEA get involved, informed and costed. Who pays for all this added infrastructure? "if you would not pay for it from your checkbook (pocket) why should the taxpayer be expected to?" link
REF Pagosa Lakes Ranch development and 100 Drago proposal for 100 acres on north side of PLR development. 1. Original development of PLR, circa 1980's has not been removed from records. What action will Planning Board take about the original plat development and this new proposal on the same 100 acres that has yet to be sold to the "alleged developer" 2. Has the FAA, Regional Hospital, et. al. been contacted and has any agency responded to restrictions on building construction impacting the free availability of flight access to the hospital emergency landing pad. 3. There appears to be sufficient reason to question the proposed multi storied "building", e.g., hotels, apartments, etc., that would or could exceed the current 35 foot height restrictions on construction in this area. See land use codes for multiple references to height restrictions. 4. What can be done on any of this proposal from "Dragoo" until he or his company obtains ownership of the land, and when and if that occurs, what can be done to ascertain who or whom any "buyers" would be of the "lots" eventually approved by the board and ultimately the city. How much of this proposal and projects are dependent upon use of tax payer dollars; how much, which agency, and who controls. 5. Last, this "Dragoo" proposal appears to have a significant impact on vehicle traffic, foot traffic, increased use of our already limited water resources, and bigger impact on sewage and drainage. Where and when do PAWS, LPEA get involved, informed and costed. Who pays for all this added infrastructure? "if you would not pay for it from your checkbook (pocket) why should the taxpayer be expected to?"
Joe Rovig asked about 1 month agoHello Joe,
1. The current property owner has given permission for the developer to submit a development application for the Pagos awest Subdivision. When the subdivision is approved, a new plat will be recorded which will supersede the previously plated property. There are no agreements associated with any previous development plans for this property.
2. Yes, there are no regulations or concerns that apply to this development due to the distance of approximately 500 feet from the Heli-Pad. The Hospital has responded with no current concerns associated with the proposed project.
3. The project currently does not propose a request for any height variances. Staff has not identified any concerns with exceeding height at this Sketch application stage. Height and other site specific design criteria is reviewed following Final Subdivision application process at the Major Design Review application stage.
4. The developer has an option to purchase the property. No taxpayer dollars are involved for installation of infrastructure, other than the state grant received. Our Code requires developers to pay for the infrastructure improvements necessary to accommodate the development needs. Some roads/sidewalks/trails will be accepted by the town for ownership and maintenance. Some roads will remain under an HOA. Water and sewer infrastructure is likely to be transferred to Pagosa Area Water and Sanitation District. LPEA will own the electric transmission lines.
5. The developer is paying or financing for infrastructure improvements. PAWSD, Town, LPEA have their own specific permitting and approval processes that include a review of the ability to serve the proposed development. Though many of these processes are underway, they are not required until the next preliminary Subdivision application stage.
-MyPagosa Team
-
Share Hi! How will the pedestrian (& cycling?) trails connect between the two major projects? We are long past due for a connector between uptown and downtown. Thank you, Elizabeth G Neer Hatcher on Facebook Share Hi! How will the pedestrian (& cycling?) trails connect between the two major projects? We are long past due for a connector between uptown and downtown. Thank you, Elizabeth G Neer Hatcher on Twitter Share Hi! How will the pedestrian (& cycling?) trails connect between the two major projects? We are long past due for a connector between uptown and downtown. Thank you, Elizabeth G Neer Hatcher on Linkedin Email Hi! How will the pedestrian (& cycling?) trails connect between the two major projects? We are long past due for a connector between uptown and downtown. Thank you, Elizabeth G Neer Hatcher link
Hi! How will the pedestrian (& cycling?) trails connect between the two major projects? We are long past due for a connector between uptown and downtown. Thank you, Elizabeth G Neer Hatcher
Elizabeth Neer asked about 1 month agoHello Elizabeth,
The Subdivision is required to continue the Town to Lakes commuter trail from Pinion Causeway to North Pagos Blvd. as well as internal connectivity of sidewalks and trails.
-MyPagosa Team
-
Share This is going to be the largest development in the history of Pagosa Springs. I am concerned that the interests of many citizens in Pagosa Springs will not be taken into consideration. Is there any way a community benefits agreement can be negotiated with the developer? on Facebook Share This is going to be the largest development in the history of Pagosa Springs. I am concerned that the interests of many citizens in Pagosa Springs will not be taken into consideration. Is there any way a community benefits agreement can be negotiated with the developer? on Twitter Share This is going to be the largest development in the history of Pagosa Springs. I am concerned that the interests of many citizens in Pagosa Springs will not be taken into consideration. Is there any way a community benefits agreement can be negotiated with the developer? on Linkedin Email This is going to be the largest development in the history of Pagosa Springs. I am concerned that the interests of many citizens in Pagosa Springs will not be taken into consideration. Is there any way a community benefits agreement can be negotiated with the developer? link
This is going to be the largest development in the history of Pagosa Springs. I am concerned that the interests of many citizens in Pagosa Springs will not be taken into consideration. Is there any way a community benefits agreement can be negotiated with the developer?
Steve Giesen asked almost 2 years agoCommunity benefits agreements are an option when there is considerable cost that the developer is not willing to pay for. This development has accepted financial responsibility for the highway improvements and has committed to an ownership option for affordable housing that is linked to income, both of these improvements are significant for this community.
-
Share Is the Pagosa View project going to have walking/biking trail that connects up with Alpha on the other side? I want a way to walk or bike downtown from Alpha without having to get on 160 on Facebook Share Is the Pagosa View project going to have walking/biking trail that connects up with Alpha on the other side? I want a way to walk or bike downtown from Alpha without having to get on 160 on Twitter Share Is the Pagosa View project going to have walking/biking trail that connects up with Alpha on the other side? I want a way to walk or bike downtown from Alpha without having to get on 160 on Linkedin Email Is the Pagosa View project going to have walking/biking trail that connects up with Alpha on the other side? I want a way to walk or bike downtown from Alpha without having to get on 160 link
Is the Pagosa View project going to have walking/biking trail that connects up with Alpha on the other side? I want a way to walk or bike downtown from Alpha without having to get on 160
PagAlphaResident asked about 2 years agoHello,
The Town-to-Lakes trail will connect downtown to uptown with a multi-modal trail along the 160 corridor. There will not be a trail to or through the county subdivision (Alpha).
- The MyPagosa.org Team
-
Share Do you have a file for Mountain Crossing Subdivision?What is it under? on Facebook Share Do you have a file for Mountain Crossing Subdivision?What is it under? on Twitter Share Do you have a file for Mountain Crossing Subdivision?What is it under? on Linkedin Email Do you have a file for Mountain Crossing Subdivision?What is it under? link
Do you have a file for Mountain Crossing Subdivision?What is it under?
Steve Fleming asked over 2 years agoHi Steve,
There is not a Mountain Crossing Subdivision project page because there are not any proposed projects on any of those properties. Please let us know if you have any other questions.
-MyPagosa Team
-
Share In the 600 WUS 160 project, I don't see provision in the plans for extension of the public walking/biking trail west from the Elem School towards uptown. Will that be included in the plans and terms of approval? on Facebook Share In the 600 WUS 160 project, I don't see provision in the plans for extension of the public walking/biking trail west from the Elem School towards uptown. Will that be included in the plans and terms of approval? on Twitter Share In the 600 WUS 160 project, I don't see provision in the plans for extension of the public walking/biking trail west from the Elem School towards uptown. Will that be included in the plans and terms of approval? on Linkedin Email In the 600 WUS 160 project, I don't see provision in the plans for extension of the public walking/biking trail west from the Elem School towards uptown. Will that be included in the plans and terms of approval? link
In the 600 WUS 160 project, I don't see provision in the plans for extension of the public walking/biking trail west from the Elem School towards uptown. Will that be included in the plans and terms of approval?
Emrys asked almost 3 years agoHello,
The 10-foot wide public trail is described in the narrative, but is not shown on the site plan and will remain a required public amenity should this development move forward. Elements of the plan, like public and private trails, will be included in the PUD agreement that will be attached to the property if the current ownership changes.
Thank you.
-MyPagosa.org Team
-
Share I understand our need for working folks housing and the natural process of growth but this is a huge increase in human population and the needs that go along with it. We moved here because of the small town atmosphere. How are you planning to provide adequate infrastructure for such an increase in new demands from all these major developments. I see increased traffic, water needs ( we are in a major drought), sewage demands, and other impacts from tourists , etc.? on Facebook Share I understand our need for working folks housing and the natural process of growth but this is a huge increase in human population and the needs that go along with it. We moved here because of the small town atmosphere. How are you planning to provide adequate infrastructure for such an increase in new demands from all these major developments. I see increased traffic, water needs ( we are in a major drought), sewage demands, and other impacts from tourists , etc.? on Twitter Share I understand our need for working folks housing and the natural process of growth but this is a huge increase in human population and the needs that go along with it. We moved here because of the small town atmosphere. How are you planning to provide adequate infrastructure for such an increase in new demands from all these major developments. I see increased traffic, water needs ( we are in a major drought), sewage demands, and other impacts from tourists , etc.? on Linkedin Email I understand our need for working folks housing and the natural process of growth but this is a huge increase in human population and the needs that go along with it. We moved here because of the small town atmosphere. How are you planning to provide adequate infrastructure for such an increase in new demands from all these major developments. I see increased traffic, water needs ( we are in a major drought), sewage demands, and other impacts from tourists , etc.? link
I understand our need for working folks housing and the natural process of growth but this is a huge increase in human population and the needs that go along with it. We moved here because of the small town atmosphere. How are you planning to provide adequate infrastructure for such an increase in new demands from all these major developments. I see increased traffic, water needs ( we are in a major drought), sewage demands, and other impacts from tourists , etc.?
BobLecour asked almost 3 years agoHello,
Increases on water and sewer facilities are planned for through the respective districts, PAWSD (Pagosa Area Water and Sanitation) and PSSGID (Pagosa Sanitation District) based on water modeling which is currently being reviewed. The developer is responsible to provide for the necessary upgrades to accommodate the new growth. This includes upgrades to delivery lines as well as "capital improvements" such as plant upgrades or storage capacity improvements. These fees may also be referred to as "tap fees". Similarly, existing roadway/highway impacts need to be reviewed by CDOT (Colorado Dept. of Transportation) and are subject to CDOT's design standards for required traffic improvements.
- MyPagosa Team
-
Share I read in the paper there is a development called Pagosa Views, and I wanted to know more about it like, it’s proposed location, what type of housing will it offer and a projected date of completion . Thanks on Facebook Share I read in the paper there is a development called Pagosa Views, and I wanted to know more about it like, it’s proposed location, what type of housing will it offer and a projected date of completion . Thanks on Twitter Share I read in the paper there is a development called Pagosa Views, and I wanted to know more about it like, it’s proposed location, what type of housing will it offer and a projected date of completion . Thanks on Linkedin Email I read in the paper there is a development called Pagosa Views, and I wanted to know more about it like, it’s proposed location, what type of housing will it offer and a projected date of completion . Thanks link
I read in the paper there is a development called Pagosa Views, and I wanted to know more about it like, it’s proposed location, what type of housing will it offer and a projected date of completion . Thanks
HopalongCassady asked almost 3 years ago